Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. neuro-psiquiatr. (Impr.) ; 76(4): 189-203, oct.-dic. 2013.
Article in English | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-721967

ABSTRACT

Background: Lithium is a light, metallic element and minerals containing it are most abundant in the Andes. John Cade introduced lithium carbonate for the treatment of mania in 1949, opening the era of modern clinical psychopharmacology. Lithium remains the most extensively studied mood-stabilizing agent. It has had a revolutionary impact in supporting bipolar manic-depressive disorder as a discrete diagnosis, and on psychiatric therapeutics. Methods: We survey the development of lithium treatment in psychiatry, including findings concerning effects on suicide. Results: Lithium is the most extensively studied treatment for bipolar disorder and the prototypical mood-stabilizing agent, despite emergence of anticonvulsants and modern antipsychotics. In addition to limiting recurrences of mania, and some reduction of recurrences of bipolar depression, lithium has demonstrated protective effects against suicide. All treatments for bipolar disorder have notable limitations, including sometimes serious adverse effects, incomplete prevention of recurrences of mania and limited prevention of depression, which accounts for three-quarters of the approximately 50% time-ill in long-term follow-up with standard treatments. Lithium can be toxic in untreated overdoses; safe dosing requires monitoring of serum concentrations. Lithium also may have mild teratogenic effects, but far less than those of anticonvulsants used for bipolar disorder. Conclusions: Lithium opened the era of modern psychopharmacology and continues as the best-established mood-stabilizing treatment for bipolar disorder as well as having strong evidence of suicide-preventing effects.


Antecedentes: Litio es un elemento metálico ligero y los minerales que lo contienen abundan predominantementeen la región andina. John Cade introdujo el uso de carbonato de litio para el tratamiento de manía en 1949, iniciando con ello la era de la moderna psicofarmacología clínica. Litio se mantiene como el más extensamente estudiando agente estabilizador del ánimo. Ha tenido un impacto revolucionario en la preservación del trastorno maniaco-depresivo o bipolar como un diagnóstico discreto y en el campo de la terapéutica psiquiátrica.Métodos: Se examina el desarrollo histórico del tratamiento con litio en psiquiatría, incluyendo hallazgos en relación a su efecto sobreconducta suicida. Hallazgos:Litio es el tipo de tratamiento más extensamente estudiado en el manejo de trastorno bipolar disorder, constituido como el prototipo de agente estabilizador del ánimo, a pesar de la emergencia de agentes anticonvulsivantes y de los antipsicóticos modernos. Además de limitar la recurrencia de episodios maniacos y reducir en algo las recurrencias de depresión bipolar, litio ha demostrado efectos protectores en relación a suicidio y conducta suicida. Todos los tipos de tratamiento de trastorno bipolar tienen limitaciones notables, incluyendo algunas veces serios efectos adversos, prevención incompleta de recurrencias de manía y prevención limitada de depresión, todo lo cual constituye las tres cuartas partes de aproximadamente el 50 % de tiempo con enfermedad en estudios de seguimiento a largo plazo con tratamientos estándar.


Subject(s)
Depression/therapy , Lithium/therapeutic use , Suicide , Bipolar Disorder/therapy
2.
Vertex rev. argent. psiquiatr ; 24(111): 351-8, 2013 Sep-Oct.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1176931

ABSTRACT

Pain disorders present highly challenging therapeutic problems, owing in part to complex co-morbidities associated with pain disorders, notably including psychiatric disorders characterized by depressed mood or anxiety. Many treatments are employed to treat pain-disorder patients, and most are unsatisfactory. Virtually all analgesic medicines in long-term use provide only partial efficacy and present substantial risks of adverse effects, loss of benefit over time, or dependency and risk of abuse. Commonly employed drugs with analgesic properties include non-opioids (mainly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents [NSAIDs] or acetaminophen), many natural or synthetic opioids (including opiates and phenylpiperidines), some antidepressants (especially those with noradrenergic activity), a few anticonvulsants, skeletal muscle relaxants or topical remedies, and a growing variety of experimental treatments. The major overlap between pain and psychiatric disorders, as well as the currently unsatisfactory state of treatments available for chronic pain syndromes, encourage a comprehensive approach to assessment and clinical management of patients with chronic pain. Many current treatment programs for pain disorder patients offer narrowly specialized and incomplete treatment options. Ideally however, such care should be provided by multi-disciplinary teams with expertise in neurology, general medicine, pain management, physical medicine and rehabilitation, as well as psychiatry. Psychiatrists as well as pain specialists can serve an essential role in leading comprehensive assessment and general management of such complex and challenging patients who are typically only partially responsive to available treatments.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/complications , Humans , Mental Disorders/complications
3.
Vertex rev. argent. psiquiatr ; 24(111): 345-50, 2013 Sep-Oct.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1176932

ABSTRACT

Pain disorders are extraordinarily prevalent throughout clinical medicine, and are highly co-morbid with various psychiatric disorders, particularly those including depression or anxiety. Assessment of such patients tends to be based on diagnostic criteria that may not reflect the complexity of the clinical problem and can result in prioritizing somatic aspects of painful syndromes at the expense of psychiatric aspects or, conversely, over-emphasize psychiatric aspects. In the first part of this overview we consider current nosological perspectives and their potential clinical consequences, epidemiological data that underscore the association of comorbid painful and affective or anxious syndromes, and consider the importance of psychiatric assessment and treatment of such patients. The major overlap between pain disorders and psychiatric disorders, as well as the unsatisfactory state of treatments available for chronic pain syndromes, encourage a comprehensive approach to assessing and clinically managing patients with chronic pain. Many programs for pain disorder patients offer narrowly specialized treatment options. To be preferred are multi-disciplinary teams with expertise in internal medicine, neurology, pain management, and rehabilitation, as well as psychology and psychiatry. In the second part of this overview, we propose that psychiatrists can serve a key role in leading comprehensive assessment and management of complex and challenging pain-psychiatric patients who are typically only partially responsive to available treatments.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/classification , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/classification , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/complications , Humans , Mental Disorders/complications , Somatoform Disorders/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL